LPDOC: The Case - Facts: Butler-Robideau Trial

 

  Home | About Us | Blog | Chapters | Donate | FAQ | Multimedia | Shop  

AIM for Freedom for Leonard Peltier

 

 About Peltier

  The Activist

  The Artist

  The Humanitarian

  The Writer

Send Cards and Letters:

Leonard Peltier

#89637-132

USP-Lewisburg

US Penitentiary

PO Box 1000

Lewisburg, PA 17837

 The Case

  Background

  Facts

  Legal Actions

 Contact Us

  Send Us an E-mail

 Events

  Calendar

  Event Planning

 Get Involved

  Call Legislators

  Educate Others

  Write Letters of Support

 News

  Mailing List

  Media Advisories

  News of the Day

  Newsletter

 Partners

  Friends of Peltier

  Have You Thought

  Humanade

  Internat'l Peltier Forum

  LeonardPeltierArt.com

  My Life Is My Sun Dance

  Oglala Commemoration

  Polu Manu Productions

  Turtle Mountain Band of
      Chippewa Indians

 Peltier Artwork

  Art Exhibits

  Art Reproductions

  Paintings

 Resources

  Petitions

  Publications

  Sample Resolution

PayPal Verified

The Butler-Robideau Trial

Peltier's Co-Defendants

Darrelle "Dino" Butler and Bob Robideau stood trial separately from Leonard Peltier who, convinced he would never receive a fair trial in the United States, had fled to Canada.

The defense team succeeded in getting the trial moved from racist South Dakota to Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Cedar Rapids was, however, a predominantly white city and concerns remained as to the likelihood of Butler and Robideau receiving a fair trial.

Immediately, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) began setting the stage for the defendants' convictions. Agents warned local police that carloads of American Indian Movement (AIM) "terrorists" were descending on the town. On May 11,1976, U.S. marshals visited every office in the Federal Building (where the trial was to be held), telling folks to prepare for shooting incidents and the seizure of hostages and advising them that marshals on the roof would be on the lookout for marauding Indians.

Elsewhere, rumors about alleged renegade activity ran rampant. A report allegedly emanating from Connecticut police intelligence, for example, stated that a "terrorist" group affiliated with AIM had hatched a plan "to kill a cop a day." The report failed to mention that the organization referenced was defunct.

On June 22, the FBI released a teletype that was distributed to law enforcement agencies throughout the country. It claimed that 2,000 AIM "Dog Soldiers" trained in "the Northwest Territory" would fan out across South Dakota and would kidnap, bomb, burn, snipe... all to disrupt the Bicentennial Celebration.

When the 2,000 "Dog Soldiers" didn't show up in South Dakota and the rest of the FBI's scare campaign was shown to be a lie, the Cedar Rapids community began to look at AIM members, who had peaceably assembled there for the trial, with a fresh eye and view the government's machinations with skepticism.

Evidence Heard

Presided over by Judge Edward McManus, the trial commenced on June 7, 1976.

The defendants admitted that they were present at the shoot-out and had exchanged fire with the FBI agents in the course of defending their women and children. 

In a search for the truth, Judge McManus allowed a broad range of evidence to be heard, often over the vigorous objections of the prosecutor. This allowed the jury to receive a full explanation of  how the shoot-out had occurred and why the Native defendants reacted as they did. 

Testimony was heard about the Pine Ridge "Reign of Terror" and from the director of the FBI himself, Clarence Kelley, on the Bureau's counterintelligence activities and tactics. Testimony prompted by the defense attorneys also brought forward a pattern of FBI misconduct in other prosecutions of AIM members, specifically those occurring after Wounded Knee II

During the trial, a key prosecution witness, Mr. Draper, also admitted that he had been threatened by the FBI and as a result had changed his testimony based on agents’ instructions, so as to support the government’s position. Another prosecution witness also was shown to have lied on the witness stand.

The Verdict

Clearly, the evidence heard at trial was sufficient to convince the jury of the defendants' claims. Further, the government's behavior before and during the trail severely damaged its credibility. In July, the jurors found that there was no evidence to link Butler and Robideau to the fatal shots. Moreover, the exchange of gun fire from a distance was deemed an act of self-defense.

Copyright 2008-2010 Leonard Peltier Defense Offense Committee. Page Last Updated on Tuesday, 17 August 2010 08:22 AM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.